| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
robotjay co-admin
Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 223 Location: Nebraska, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it looks good. Let's light this candle.
-Jay _________________ "Nothing is fool-proof; For we fools are ingenious and will find a way." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's been a bit of a roller coaster trying to get this STL file ready, but it's almost there. This post is mostly to remind me of what I did to generate it, such that I have it as reference for the next time I have a go at it.
First I made a file that included 110 parts in one file, and it had a min $150. I got over that price point by uping the qty to 2, this put me around $152, and some methods where over $200. The two lowest cost were SLA and Polyjet. Looking at the pictures, it appears the rigid polyjet is slightly more accurate than the SLA. Both claim to have the same offical specs. SLA was $152, polyjet was $160. Machined was an opiton, but I didn't trust it as these parts have some very hard to machine features, so I ignored the machined quote.
I then uploaded a STL of just one part, and got a quote for 200. That came back at about $5k, so about $25 each. I'll assume the materail cost is minimal, so I'll consider them to have a $25 setup fee per part.
So, it would appear that if one can get it done in one file / one job, then it will be the lowest cost. Each setup is probably around $25. Based on the first run it appears the materail cost $100 for 220 parts. So about I expect that for $125, we can get 275 parts. I had a bit of trouble getting 250 parts, kept running out of memory. I'll keep trying. Right now it's uploading the 250 part file. I've also got a 200 part file up there that I've been working with.
Also it appears that the LxW dims play a roll in the cost. I made the array 5x50, and it's costs about half of the 10x10 array. Weird.
More to come shortly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I just ordered quote number 435861 from quickparts.com which includes an array of 500 polyjet parts that hare held together by a small piece of webbing. I ordered qty 2 for $160 + shipping. I chose ground, I think that will be lowest cost. So 1,000 parts for not much money. We'll have to see how these come out. Fingers crossed. It notes I'll get a call from them to go over the details of this order. Pending no hiccups there, we should be good to go, and perhaps have parts in a week or two. Fingers crossed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barryfzr
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 13
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nice boat, and glad to hear you got one working. I'm guessing you used the analog version. I searched for that servo, but it didn't produce a google hit. It it a normal servo? Motor, gears and a POT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barryfzr
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes its a normal analogue servo, its the biggest hobby one futaba do. Sorry I put too many s's in ;o) its a futaba s3306 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't think I see the hip bone from the leg bone in your design. In my case I mounted it in the servo, for a fully self contained unit. In your case it looks like you mounted it external. I'm not sure how yours was used. The OE design I have posted above can be made to work with analog, and might fit in your servo. Are you interested in giving it a try? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barryfzr
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 13
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's cool, and I'd bet expensive. Appears you had a custom brass shaft and aluminum POT body made for this.
On a different note, I've run into some problems with the polyjet parts. When I made the array of parts, I used a small webbing between the parts to make them all come out as one file, instead of several files. They appear to be concerned about breaking this webbing. Even after told them I wasn't concerned, they still expressed concern. I also offered make it with out the webbing, as the polyjet isn't concerned, it's just my ability to make a file that was an issue. However that also didn't seem to help. My suspicion is that they real concern is that I'm using prototypes for production. They simply didn't like that. I know they also are pushing short run injection molded parts, so I suspect they don't like productions like this because they are trying to push their other services.
I'm still bouncing back and forth with them. I'm having trouble catching up with the sales guy. He leaves at 5:00 and I get home at 6:00 to 6:30. I caught the production manager last night, perhaps he's more concerned than the sales guys are.
If worst comes to worst, they will put it up as no bid, and I'll have to shop around. I'm sure we can find some one that is willing to do this, it might not be these folks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barryfzr
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
It was'nt too expensive... I just knocked them up on the lathe in about an hour
I think for the next one though I will try and mount the encoder on a main board with the driver electronics |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like an interesting approach, perhaps mechanically intensive. I've had good success with putting a hole in the PCB and mounting the magnet under the chip, instead of on top of the chip. So far I've been able to keep it on center, no calibration was required. If you vary off center by a tinny amount, you really need to calibrate it to keep if from producing an semi erroneous result.
Have you see my assembly pages posted here?
http://www.openservo.com/ConstructionTutorial_MG995_open-encoder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barryfzr
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hey thats a great idea thankyou.....
If I mount the chip upside down as you mentioned I could drill a 3mm centre hole in the pcb to align the shaft holding the magnet. Maybe put a teflon washer in there too.
I have to finish a boat this month ... but more photos to follow soon ;o)
Are you on facebook?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No face book for me. Haven't really had much interest in it. My wife is into that. I don't know much about it really. I share photos with photobucket. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jharvey
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 266 Location: Maine USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Just heard from Quickparts. They put this project on no bid. I can't change the design in a manner to make them happy with it. They didn't list any specific details about what was wrong. My gut tells me they just don't want to do an array of parts. Blasted. I guess I'll have to shop around to see if I can find another company that will give it a try. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robotjay co-admin
Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 223 Location: Nebraska, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jared,
I got in touch with my contact at QP and here's what he replied:
| Quote: | Hi Jay,
I have spoken to the project manager regarding the project for Jared.
He mentioned that he tried calling a few times as well as sent an email.
Regardless, he is very concerned that the part will not print properly as designed.
Apparently there are some .010” features on the part which will not build in any process.
Our Project Managers are in place to catch these type of issues before the part is built.
This eliminates you receiving a part that will not build or would be impossible to finish without
damaging.
Regardless, I will compare the file we spoke about and the file Jared sent to see the differences, if any. |
Do you know what .010" features he's talking about? From this message, it looks like we'd run into similar issues even if we look at another vendor. Talk to you soon.
-Jay _________________ "Nothing is fool-proof; For we fools are ingenious and will find a way." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|